Eytons' Earth: Natural & Alternative Medicine

[relpub3]

Most people would take a clay bath using a few pounds of clay, making the bath watery. I am used to taking my clay baths this way so I decided to why not make a bath where the clay is really thick and viscous, not watery.

I used a 55 gallon plastic drum and filled it to around halfway with clean water. I added around 3 pounds of sea salt and then added around 80 kilos of bentonite clay. I let the clay soak in the water for around 24 hours to get it hydrated. I did not heat the bath and initially I thought I would be chilled considering I would be soaking in cold clay magma.

to my surprise, the cool temperature of the clay magma was very comfortable and after around half an hour, I noticed that I did not feel cold or chilled because my body heat seemed to extend to the clay around my body, heating it up. the thick clay acts as an insulator and soon I found myself relaxing without feeling cold.

I first tried it for half an hour, then I extended it to as long as an hour and a half. I did not throw away the clay magma after each use but reused it again and again. I did the baths everyday in the evening for around a week.

I feel that such a bath is very very powerful in pulling out heavy metals and toxins compared to a watery clay bath. I think I will be doing all my clay baths this way from now on. The disadvantage is that I cannot heat the water or add hydrogen peroxide to such a thick mixture.

Inspite of the initial heavier expense of using a lot of clay, I think you need not change the clay magma at all. Just adding a few pounds of clay every now and then to replace the clay that sticks to your body and removed when you end your clay bath.

What do you readers think?

Alberto

[eytonsearth]

Hi Alberto:

Yes, this is actually the traditional and correct way to do clay baths. Such an experience will be far more effective for a wide range of conditions than simply taking a bath with clay water. This includes cancers, tumors and arthritis for absolute certain (I have either done comparative studies on these three topics myself, or have associates that have done them, although case histories are very limited... only a few).

However, there is only one thing to consider that may be in contention with that belief. You must consider that a clay magma and a clay water are two very different substances. Here, you must also consider that individual clay particles share all of the characteristics of crystals.

A clay magma will work on the body as one whole substance. The more clay you have, the more intense the energy field it produces; the more power it has to extend this field into the body; the more powerful the collective transducing effect of the clay will be.

However, a clay water that is hydrated properly will act quite differently.

By hydrated correctly, I mean that enough water is added to clay to ensure that each and every particle is isolated by enough H2O to be able to acdtively repel each other. Each and every particle will act independently. Van der Waal's force can actually sometimes be observed near the surface of the skin, in fact ( where particles, by virtue of having their charge nuetralized, agglomerate and drop out of suspension). Each and every particle will act independently. Each particle has its ion exchange capacity, and is no doubt very active in the water.

Also, as you have rightly noted, with a clay water bath, there is alot of liberty to modify the water to achieve many things (according to the precepts of balneotherapy and balneology). This includes the delivery of trace minerals, such as, but not limited to, copper sulfates, magnesium chloride, pottasium oxides, silver isolates, gold isolates, etc.

I do not know at this point if there would be cases where a clay water bath would be better, as there is very little comparative data available at this point.

You can take even take things further if you want.

I've always stated that simple composition is true composition; and that simple composition yields complex manifestations. Nature best composes in three.

I have broken clay therapy down to its most basic components: Water, Earth, and Sunshine.

Therefore, my own studies over the last seventeen years have led me to consider all three elements very carefully.

Next, if you ever get the opportunity to blend different clays together, you will likely realize that doing so can greatly enhance the clay bath experience.

Finally, with "sunshine" (meaning energy of course), we know that sunlight itself can be used to enhance the effect of clay. However, we now also know that far infrared can act to increase the efficacy of clay as well. Simple far infrared lamps can be used over clay, or complex devices such as Gou Gong Mineral Lamps.

As far as reusing clay, an individual must evaluate things based on their own experience. Some clays might grow mold quickly. Pay very careful attention to the smell. At some point, the clay will have to be changed.

Kind Regards,

[metalgear]

i think its absolutely true...its always good to use more clay proportion in water...i have tried it does really afect the cure.

[sun]

If reusing the same clay for several baths (over a period of many days/weeks), wouldn't the clay over time become more and more toxic as the toxins that it pulls out of the body accumulate in the clay?

Is there a risk that those toxins that have been pulled out of the body and are present in the clay now, reenter into our body? If this is the case, it's probably wise to change the clay as often as possible. But if - on the other hand - the toxins once pulled out of the body cannot reenter it from the clay, it would probably be ok (especially much cheaper) to keep the same clay for a long period of time. - At least as long as mold is not a problem.

Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks!

[sun]

Is there anything wrong with using a drum made of PLASTIC, as relpub3 did?

Healthy greetings!

[eytonsearth]

Hi -

Nothing at all, provided that the plastic is not contaminated...

[sun]

Jason, thanks for your answer regarding plastic drums.

Do you also have an answer to my other post:


If reusing the same clay for several baths (over a period of many days/weeks), wouldn't the clay over time become more and more toxic as the toxins that it pulls out of the body accumulate in the clay?

Is there a risk that those toxins that have been pulled out of the body and are present in the clay now, reenter into our body? If this is the case, it's probably wise to change the clay as often as possible. But if - on the other hand - the toxins once pulled out of the body cannot reenter it from the clay, it would probably be ok (especially much cheaper) to keep the same clay for a long period of time. - At least as long as mold is not a problem.

Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks!

[eytonsearth]

Greetings,

There will come a point where the clay stops sorpting toxic substances and starts to radiate them.

If you are creating a full magma clay bath for use with one person, and you cover the bath in between sessions, then the clay should be fine for some time. Clays soprtion power is quite incredible.

It is not easy to determine just how long. That will have to be an individual choice.

[sun]

Jason, thanks for helping.

Can you give any estimation regarding the length of time for which the magma can be used? 1 week, several weeks, several months?

For how long would you personnally use it?

Or what would one have to look out for, when deciding when to throw the magma away?

Without any knowledge, I would probably use it for about 2-3 weeks, doing 3-4 baths per week and covering the magma after each bath.

Peace,
Sun

[Shelley]